I found
Smith’s account of ambition to be extremely interesting! When I think of
ambition, I think of personal drive and individual initiative. However, Smith
seems give an account of ambition that stems from a desire for public
admiration and sympathy—something that seems to be based outside the self. According
to Smith, ambition acts as a response to other peoples’ vanity. Because people
are more likely to sympathize with joy than sorrow or hardship, “we make parade
of our riches, and conceal our poverty” (50). We admire and respect those who
are wealthy because it is much easier to sympathize with the rich than to
attempt to understand another person’s sorrow, especially since we can only
imagine another person’s hardship rather than fully understand it. For this
reason, people vainly consume superfluities and show off their wealth “because
[those who do so] fee[l] that they naturally draw upon [themselves] the
attention of the world” (51). Vanity is therefore a response to an attempt to gain
the sympathies of other people and win their interests.
But those
who are not born into affluence cannot parade invisible wealth. Smith states,
“the poor man… is ashamed of his poverty. He feels that it either places him
out of the sight of mankind, or, that if they take any notice of him, they
have, however, scarce any fellow-feeling with the misery and distress which he
suffers” (51). In either regard, Smith argues that those who are impoverished feel
shut out from the world because they are unable to inspire sympathy in others.
It is this feeling of solitude Smith conveys when he contends, “The poor man
goes out and comes in unheeded, and when in the midst of a crowd is in the same
obscurity as if shut up in his own hovel” (51). In order to combat these
feelings of solitude, Smith asserts that an individual of lower class is willing
to work extremely hard by employing “the labour of his body [and/or] the
activity of his mind” in order to bring his talents into the public view (55).
Thus, ambition derives from an attempt to acquire public admiration—admiration
that the wealthy were able to achieve simply by a vain display of wealth. Smith
ultimately argues that ambition is driven by human desire for the sympathy and
affections of others. But my questions are: is this an accurate account of
ambition? Do individuals strive to succeed simply because they wish to gain the
affections and praise of other people, or do they do so for some internal
reason too? Is it fair or accurate to say that ambition stems from others’
displays of vanity, and if so, is this the correct interpretation of the
American Dream?
Awesome post. This concerned me as well, and I think Smith's account is a gross oversimplification of "bettering our condition." People regularly choose occupations which are more meaningful, but which they can less effectively parade around. This seems to suggest that what we're looking for is not merely this external approval, but some sort of fulfillment that is determined on a subjective basis.
ReplyDeleteI'm curious to see what other people think of your question, but I have a question of my own to tack on: In section III, Smith writes that the "man of rank and distinction...render[s] himself the object of...observation and fellow-feeling [from] everybody around him," but in his discussion of the selfish passions (Joy in particular, on page 41), he claims that an "upstart, though of the greatest merit, is generally disagreeable." This seems like a contradiction, but am I missing something here? Let's call this high-ranking upstart a lottery winner -- does he glean fellow-feeling from people or not?