In his discussion of human rights, Amartya Sen tackles
the coherence critique. According to this perspective, a right has a “perfect
obligation- a specific duty of a particular agent for the realization of that
right” (230). Since human rights lack a precise and corresponding duty, these
rights are not considered as substantial. Sen highlights that human rights
should not be disregarded on this ground. By invoking Kant’s “imperfect
obligation,” he effectively handles this critique by highlighting how human
rights call for a general demand: “While it is not the specific duty of any
given individual to make sure that the person has her rights fulfilled, the
claims can be generally addressed to all those who are in a position to help”
(230). In the scope of human rights, although it is not any particular person’s
responsibility to fulfill these rights, we ought to help those in need. Sen
sets up an underlying, universal obligation to help others have access to basic
human rights.
Even
though Sen provides a clear picture of a general demand required by human
rights, he neglects to include specificity on whom we should help first. Under
Sen’s current model, if we are in the position to help others, it is uncertain
whether we should prioritize helping the local homeless or the starving children
in India. Considering our previous discussion on relative position, I would
like to push Sen a little bit further and wonder if he would approve of a weighing
system to determine whose rights to fulfill first. While Sen proposes that we
have a universal obligation to help others, I would argue that limited resources compel us to
prioritize our aid. If we accept a weighing system, would those who live in
our community have a greater weight than those far away from us or would there
be no preference all since they are all human beings? Sen states that the
general demand from human rights is directed towards “those who are in a
position to help” (230). It seems that since we are more equipped to help those
around us, we should prioritize helping others in our immediate vicinity.
No comments:
Post a Comment